Core Level selection for early 2016

by **roncli** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:43 pm

My objective opinion is Fuzed in, Take2 in, Nysa out.

by **Cyrus** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 4:57 pm

Fuzed sux.

by **Drakona** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 8:37 pm

by **Lady Silver** » Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:15 pm

Crimson!? Now a core level!?!? Very cool! <3

That is all I have to say

by **The@$$Man!** » Fri Jan 01, 2016 5:19 am

Take2 < Fuzed as a core level any day.

by **Drakona** » Fri Jan 01, 2016 12:45 pm

Ok! We're keeping all 11. That means the core levels this season are the same as last season, plus crimson.

by **organic io (formerly goldie)** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 8:44 am

After all these years it's cool to see Vamped and Athena still in the "core" levels. Especially Athena!!!! I probably have never seen most of those other levels.

by **organic io (formerly goldie)** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:46 pm

P.S. If I ever come back I'm going to push for Minerva

Or is that too "big" for you all these days????

by **Jediluke** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 2:30 pm

NYSA used to be considered small and heavy on missiles....well now nysa is considered to be nearly too large for 1 v 1 and sparse

by **Sirius** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 3:31 pm

I don't know about sparse - it has over 10 homing missiles, which is definitely more than most of the modern ones unless you start throwing multipliers in - but it is on the larger side compared to the average. Personally, I like it quite a bit, except that the bottom floor would have been much better if it weren't a de-facto dead-end.

Minerva, on the other hand... yes you'd meet resistance on that for sure. You can still play it in a 1v1, but in a close match-up (where neither side can afford to go too aggressive) it's going to take forever, and that's not really much fun. Except for observers with some time to kill, I guess.